Tampilkan postingan dengan label providers. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label providers. Tampilkan semua postingan

Rabu, 02 Februari 2011

Could the Australian Government Turn Off the Internet

Could what has happened in Egypt occur in Australia? That is Turning off the internet. It is as easy as clicking a switch. A government would just contact the main telecommunications company explain the state of emergency and the telco would turn it off. Minor internet providers would follow.

A major problem for a government would be cutting off internet access of journalists. Much of their system is outside of public providers. Turn off that system and you stop government agencies talking to each other.

Cutting off access for major cities would be a waste of time. Television, radio and the print media could not be stopped. In a place like Australia where information transmission is decentralised there is no one person to instruct.

Let's face it - any Australian government that did pull the plug would self-destruct. There is no way the people would ever trust it again. There is also the problem of "leakage" as a few minor Internet providers refuse to submit - some are foreign owned.

Australians are just as smart as other people and many would find "work-arounds", so even if the switch was flicked it would not have much of an effect on communication to the outside. Business would be affected because the Internet is widely used.
~~~~~Internet~~~~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sabtu, 12 Juni 2010

Australian Government Plans Greater Privacy Intrusion

The Australian Government is planning to order Internet providers to keep records of their clients browsing history. Plans are afoot to examine an Internet user's political leaning, sexual orientation and general interests. This is part of the Government's plan to join the European Convention on Cybercrime.

Critics say everyone will be classed as criminal from the word go, and it takes away personal freedom. Michael Fraser of the Communications Law Centre at the University of Technology has condemned the move. Who you send emails to will become public as government employees responsible for data collection gain access. The temptation to leak such knowledge to the press will be too great.

Australia should make its own path in the world not follow what has happened in Europe. Countries in that region are in an awful political and economic mess. With people allowed to reside in any country they wish, political and financial systems are breaking down and states are trying to pry on people's private lives in response.

It is common knowledge that the Howard government was able to stop continued production of an ABC comedy program by putting pressure on the ABC. If the Government gets private information what more will it do - stop bloggers giving their own opinion?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Senin, 19 April 2010

Australia's Internet Filter Will Not Work

The Australian Government plans to set up an Internet filter to stop people accessing sites that it deems dangerous or distasteful. Censoring books and films in the past has been a dismal failure. Stephen Fry the Communications minister commissioned the Enex TestLab to find out if such a move would be successful. When the research body reported back it said the Government could try to block access but people would find ways to get around it. Despite this finding the Government is going ahead. It is wasting taxpayers' money for the Government to continue. Unless it also blocks free trade between countries, people will buy IP services from offshore companies (see Vista Computer Solutions).

Let's face it the average person is not interested in the sites that the Government is banning. Only those people with devious or damaging tendencies will want to, and they will set out to maintain their access. There are a few sites that have been selected which, in my opinion, the Government should leave for individuals to decide. Banning the "right to suicide" site is interfering with people's right to choose.

Another issue is - Will the Government use the filter for its own benefit in the future? We cannot see into the future. However, once a firm step has been made into censorship it is not much use in hindsight to say we should not have allowed it in the first place. "Terrorist" sites are to be banned. Should all Muslim sites be next? Then ban all Iranian sites? There seems to be no clear line where it is to stop. We plainly see how arbitrary China is with its censorship.

The list of sites will be determined by the Australian Communications and Media Authority which categorizes magazines, DVDs etc. But, it will be kept secret from the public. This is a clear danger signal - censorship in secret. An operator of a site cannot apply to have a decision reviewed. Site owners cannot appeal through any judicial process.

National ratings authorities are notorious for getting things wrong by banning films and books in a "knee jerk" way. For example, it is not unusual for restrictions on controversial material to be changed after just a few years. What about sites pushing for legalization of marijuana? Some states in the US allow this drug to be used. To stop Australians from reading the views of marijuana supporters is clearly breaching civil rights. What about pro-graffiti sites? The current classification code allows for anything that promotes crime to be banned.

Ironically, porn will not be banned. Personally, I would like porn sites to be banned. The Government will not even consider this because if it tried porn would flood in like bad grog with Prohibition. Australia had a ridiculous system before the advent of the Internet: porn was banned but Australians could still purchase such material from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and receive it in the mail.

The Government's Internet filter will fail. Proxy sites based overseas will do good business. What is to stop friends in other countries sending site information via email? Peer to peer sharing is also well established. How will overseas companies like Google be brought on board? Google has already left mainland China. The Internet pervades the world. If the majority of nations restricted access, information would still be obtained from the few free nations that were left!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .